Nsf intellectual merit
To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:Intellectual merit:the intellectual merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; r impacts:the broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. Nsfs mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in nsf programs, projects, and activities.
What is intellectual merit
These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. Grant administration disputes and r iii - nsf proposal processing and als received by nsf are assigned to the appropriate nsf program for acknowledgement and, if they meet nsf requirements, for review.
A pi or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the nsf grants and agreements officer does so at its own risk. I), prior to the review of a evaluating nsf proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful.
Dissemination to enhance scientific and technological understanding; document is clear that no one example is relevant to all proposals. What extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
Authorized individuals in the organizations sponsored projects office (or equivalent) can initiate or review requests for proposal file updates using the "submit proposals/supplements/file updates/withdrawals" module via the fastlane "research administration will consider only one request for a proposal file update per proposal at a time. Everything in the file, except information that identifies either reviewers or other pending or declined proposals is usually releasable to the s are made available directly to the pi, to provide feedback for the purpose of improving proposed research and research methods, and to assist in preparation of future proposals.
Important factors to consider include: type of organization represented, reviewer diversity, age distribution and geographic balance. Merit criterion: the potential of the applicant to advance knowledge based on a holistic analysis of the complete application, including the personal, relevant background, and future goals statement, graduate research plan statement, strength of the academic record, description of previous research experience or publication/presentations, and references.
Plotting your evidence on a logic model is a good way to figure out if you have sufficient evidence regarding outcomes as well as activities and you find gaps that will impair your ability to make a compelling case about what you’ve achieved with your current grant, update your evaluation plan accordingly. When you write your next proposal, you will be required to present evidence of your achievements under the specific headings of “intellectual merit” and “broader impacts” – if you don’t, your proposal is at risk of being returned without learn more, check out these resources:Daniel l.
No commitment on the part of nsf or the government should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with an nsf program officer. Because of the large volume of proposals, this review and consideration process may take up to six months.
If you don’t have good evidence of important achievements, revise your evaluation plan and start collecting data as soon as possible. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well gful assessment and evaluation of nsf funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects.
Finally, don't skip sections in the fastlane grfp application form, because what you add to these sections helps to document your potential for im & more about "broader impacts". Nsf will notify the grantee of receipt of requests for copies of funded proposals so the grantee may advise nsf of such inventions described, or other confidential, commercial or proprietary information contained in the proposal.
These broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. It is designed to help you understand and address broader impacts, but it does not in any way replace the instructions of a specific solicitation or nsf’s grant proposal guide (part of the proposal and award policies and procedures guide).
In 2013, nsf removed a list of examples that had been available in previous versions of its grant proposal guide. Nsf values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally relevant outcomes.
This caveat in mind, you can still find the list in this nsf document, “merit review broader impacts criterion: representative activities. Selection of nsf guidelines for the selection of reviewers are designed to ensure selection of experts who can give program officers the proper information needed to make a recommendation in accordance with the nsb approved criteria for selection of projects.
To identify which projects to support, nsf relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing nsfs mission to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes. When a request is accepted, the proposed files or revisions to proposal attributes will immediately replace the existing files and become part of the official can access the proposal file update module via the "proposal functions" section of fastlane.
Broader impacts may be accomplished through:Activities directly related to specific research projects, ties supported by, but complementary to the guide goes on to explain that the broader impacts criterion promotes societally relevant outcomes beyond scientific knowledge, including, but not limited to:Full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in stem;. Given that nsf is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:All nsf projects should be of the highest quality and have the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals.