Writing a literature review for a research project

This may be necessary to some extent, but in this case a focused review would only deal in detail with those studies at the interface between epidemiology and the spread of focus is an important feature of a successful review, this requirement has to be balanced with the need to make the review relevant to a broad audience. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent er the following issues before writing the literature review:If your assignment is not very specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions:1.

Research project literature review

Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. Review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis].

In reviews written by multiple authors, this may be achieved by assigning the review of the results of a coauthor to different 10: be up-to-date, but do not forget older studiesgiven the progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers, today's reviews of the literature need awareness not just of the overall direction and achievements of a field of inquiry, but also of the latest studies, so as not to become out-of-date before they have been published. And synthesize the research findings and conclusions experts in the field: names/labs that are frequently conflicting theories, results, for popularity of theories and how this has/has not changed over time.

If you include studies prior to the past five years that are not landmark studies, you should defend why you have chosen these rather than more current 5: summarize the literature in table or concept map (2006) recommends building tables as a key way to help you overview, organize, and summarize your findings, and suggests that including one or more of the tables that you create may be helpful in your literature review. The exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections.

This way, by the time you have read the literature you selected, you will already have a rough draft of the course, this draft will still need much rewriting, restructuring, and rethinking to obtain a text with a coherent argument [11], but you will have avoided the danger posed by staring at a blank document. A good strategy is to begin by searching the homer catalog for books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues.

If you have any questions, comments,Or suggestions to improve these guidelines please me at e-mail hrallis@ines for writing a literature helen mongan-rallis. Common mistakes to are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research s in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;.

My advice is, while reading, to start writing down interesting pieces of information, insights about how to organize the review, and thoughts on what to write. In the case of a literature review, you are really creating a new forest, which you will build by using the trees you found in the literature you read.

A diversity of feedback perspectives on a literature review can help identify where the consensus view stands in the landscape of the current scientific understanding of an issue [24]. Methods ecol evol 2: 238– la, tannery nh, kanter sl (2011) reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews.

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your of literature form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. Writing your literature you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section.

Were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? If you do include tables as part of your review each must be accompanied by an analysis that summarizes, interprets and synthesizes the literature that you have charted in the can plan your table or do the entire summary chart of your literature using a concept map (such as using inspiration).

Using referencing software from the very beginning of your endeavour will save you 4: choose the type of review you wish to writeafter having taken notes while reading the literature, you will have a rough idea of the amount of material available for the review. Your analysis can make generalizations across a majority of studies, but should also note inconsistencies across studies and over fy gaps in the literature, and reflect on why these might exist (based on the understandings that you have gained by reading literature in this field of study).

9: include your own relevant research, but be objectivein many cases, reviewers of the literature will have published studies relevant to the review they are writing. Interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem.

If the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, it should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and possibilities for future steps to writing a literature review. Ways to organize your literature your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published.

Key statistics that you may want to use in the introduction to your useful quotes that you may want to include in your review. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review.

Related items that provide additional information but that are not key to understanding the research problem can be included in a list of further short quotes are okay if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Develop a working a one or two sentence statement summarizing the conclusion you have reached about the major trends and developments you see in the research that has been done on your subject.