Results and discussion in research paper
Note that negative results, and how you handle them, offer you the opportunity to write a more engaging discussion section, therefore, don't be afraid to highlight ing raw data or intermediate calculations. An example would be: “in the case of determining available housing to single women with children in rural areas of texas, the findings suggest that access to good schools is important," then move on to explaining this endations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections. An article was considered to be written using the imrad structure only when the headings “methods, results, and discussion,” or synonyms for these headings, were all included and clearly printed.
Information, which today is highly standardized in one section, would be absent, repeated, or dispersed among sections in earlier siongradually and progressively, the imrad structure was adopted by the studied journals. Discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of significance. Number tables and figures in separate lists, but consecutively by the order in which you mention them in the text.
In this model, it is helpful to provide a brief conclusion that ties each of the findings together and provides a narrative bridge to the discussion section of the your : just as the literature review should be arranged under conceptual categories rather than systematically describing each source, organize your findings under key themes related to addressing the research problem. It evolved to a more structured form in which methods and results were incipiently described and interpreted, while the letter form disappeared . Clinical chemistry 56 (november 2010): ance of a good section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you:Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under t the underlying meaning of your research, note possible implications in other areas of study, and explore possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your ght the importance of your study and how it may be able to contribute to and/or help fill existing gaps in the field.
- einleitung hausarbeit personalmanagement
- organizational citizenship behavior research papers
- good thesis powerpoint presentations
The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper. University of southern sity of southern zing your social sciences research zing your social sciences research paper: 8. Highlight the most important findings you want readers to remember as they transition into the discussion section.
If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of ey thomas m. Or to critical issues revealed from the data that were not considered initially in your : besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section. Please see our apa formatting guide for specific the owl you're requesting copies of this the owl you're linking to this ght ©1995-2017 by the writing lab & the owl at purdue and purdue rights reserved.
This part of the discussion should begin with a description of any unanticipated findings, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. This is useful in orientating the reader's focus back to the research after reading about the methods of data gathering and ion of non-textual elements, such as, figures, charts, photos, maps, tables, etc. You don’t want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what it all means.
- declaration of independence research paper
- small bakery business plan
- questionnaire for research proposal
You should start by referring back to your research questions, discuss your results, then set them into the context of the literature, and then into broader is likely to be one of the longest sections of your dissertation, and it’s a good idea to break it down into chunks with sub-headings to help your reader to navigate through the ng out the you have your outline in front of you, you can start to map out how your results fit into the will help you to see whether your results are over-focused in one area, which is why writing up your research as you go along can be a helpful process. According to huth , the wide use of the imrad structure may be largely credited to editors, who insisted on papers being clearly formatted to benefit readers and to facilitate the process of peer ing to meadows , development and changes in the internal organization of the scientific article is simply an answer to the constant growth of information. With offices in the us, india, japan, china, south korea, and singapore, editage is a trusted global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions.
You want to begin your discussion by reminding your readers once again what your hypotheses were and what your overall story is. The results section should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: the case of the edinburgh medical journal.
Make sure that everything you discuss is covered in the results universities require a separate section on recommendations for policy and practice and/or for future research, while others allow you to include this in your discussion, so check the guidelines people are likely to write this section best by preparing an outline, setting out the broad thrust of the argument, and how your results support may find techniques like mind mapping are helpful in making a first outline; check out our page: creative thinking for some ideas about how to think through your ideas. If not, suggest any modifications and improvements that could be made to the the reason that you did not find a significant correlation is because your sampling was not random, or you did not use sensitive enough discussion section is not always about what you found, but what you did not find, and how you deal with that. Often, a combination of both the past and the present tense is used in sentences within the discussion e: 63% of the children demonstrated an elevated level of at least one risk factor, indicating that are children with obesity are at an increased risk of cardiovascular that the first part of the sentence refers to the results; hence the past tense has been used for this part.