Why is a literature review important

Had you prepared a literature review at the onset of your research, you could have easily avoided such mishap. These include but not limited to the following:Firstly, review of literature acts as a stepping-stone towards achievement of the study objectives.

Need for literature review

Please keep  21 months ago love it 18 23 months ago wonderful article, i really appreciate e 2 years ago your post is great, it has just helped me write an assignment. Through this process of winnowing, you will be able to place the relevance of your research in the larger context of what others researchers have already done on your topic in the past (see reference 1).

Interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues?

It is often useful to review the types of studies that previous researchers have launched as a means of determining what approaches might be of most benefit in further developing a topic. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review.

The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future ological review. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is .

This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. During the compilation of your review, you could have noticed how someone else has done similar research on your topic.

Should any additional questions arise during the course of the research, the researcher will know which experts to consult in order to quickly clear up those le a t:marketing and student outreach librarian(904) :facebook pagepinterest pagetwitter pageyoutube : steps in conducting a literature review >>. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the , anthea.

When you are about to publish the paper, you soon learn that someone has already published a paper on a topic very similar to yours. Analysisblast (basic local alignment search tool)blast (stand-alone)blast link (blink)conserved domain search service (cd search)genome protmapgenome workbenchinfluenza virusprimer-blastprosplignsplignall sequence analysis resources...

Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. As a result, they can give you credit for your due diligence: you have done your fact-finding and fact-checking mission, one of the initial steps of any research a student, you may not be an expert in a given field; however, by listing a thorough review in your research paper, you are telling the audience, in essence, that you know what you are talking about.

Once a researcher has determined an area to work with for a research project, a search of relevant information sources will help determine what is already known about the topic and how extensively the topic has already been fication of the experts on a particular topic. Gbahabo 8 weeks ago i got a material to add to my work here, that is the integrative review.

There are many faces to the mcid, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to : 11845014 [indexed for medline] sharepublication type, mesh termspublication typereviewmesh termsclinical medicine/methods*clinical trials as topic/methods*health status indicatorshumansresearch design*rheumatic diseases/physiopathologyrheumatic diseases/therapy*rheumatology/methods*treatment outcomelinkout - more resourcesfull text sourceswolters kluwerovid technologies, literature sourcescos scholar universecited by patents in - the lensmedicalclinical trials - medlineplus health informationpubmed commons home. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her ly, literature reviews provide a solid background to back one’s investigation.

Those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required.

A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. You have written a research paper, an original paper in your area of specialization, without a literature review.

The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Commentshow to join pubmed commonshow to cite this comment:Ncbi > literature > ncbi web site requires javascript to tionresourcesall resourceschemicals & bioassaysbiosystemspubchem bioassaypubchem compoundpubchem structure searchpubchem substanceall chemicals & bioassays resources...

This allows the author to demonstrate how his / her research is linked to prior efforts and how it extends to build on better y, literature reviews help the researcher to avoid duplication, identify the gaps in other studies with the goal of filling them, borrow from the research design and methodology used to investigate that particular problem and to interpret his or her own general terms, the literature review helps  to provide a context for the research, justify the research, ensure the research hasn’t been done, show where the research fits into the existing body of knowledge, enable the researcher to learn from previous theory on the subject, illustrate how the subject has previously been studied, highlight flaws in previous research, outline gaps in previous research, show that the work is adding to the understanding and knowledge of the field, help refine, refocus or even change the temptation of being shallow, (and even to copy and paste) in review of literature is high. The review plays a critical role in analyzing the existing literature and giving justification as to how one’s research fits into the existing body of knowledge.